From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 28 22:04:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE6916A420; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:04:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ambrisko@ambrisko.com) Received: from mail2.ambrisko.com (mail2.ambrisko.com [64.174.51.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F78B43D48; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:04:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ambrisko@ambrisko.com) Received: from server2.ambrisko.com (HELO www.ambrisko.com) ([192.168.1.2]) by mail2.ambrisko.com with ESMTP; 28 Mar 2006 14:03:33 -0800 Received: from ambrisko.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.ambrisko.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2SM45AV018808; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:04:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ambrisko@ambrisko.com) Received: (from ambrisko@localhost) by ambrisko.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id k2SM45j9018807; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:04:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ambrisko) From: Doug Ambrisko Message-Id: <200603282204.k2SM45j9018807@ambrisko.com> In-Reply-To: <20060328214549.GB61480@lath.rinet.ru> To: Oleg Bulyzhin Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 14:04:05 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "Stephen P. Cravey" , ambrisko@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPMI and bge (again) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:04:06 -0000 Oleg Bulyzhin writes: | On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 12:38:42PM -0800, Doug Ambrisko wrote: | | > I don't see it attached. I'd like to see your changes and I'd like know | > of your plans about getting it in. | | I didnt test it under load yet (server i've used moved to production so | i have limited testing capabilites atm). | Issue to be fixed: we should not touch phy in bge_stop having asf enabled. | I think your patch is worth commiting to HEAD asap but shouldnt be MFCed | prior 6.1R. What do you think? I'll merge your changes in and make sure it has the heart beat change then commit it to -current. Yes, I agree this is not a candidate for 6.1. If it doesn't cause troubles then it should make it into 6.2. Thanks, Doug A.