From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 18 07:57:06 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8688016A4CE; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:57:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.server.rpi.edu (smtp1.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.1])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2D4C543D1F; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 07:57:06 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu)
Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47])
	by smtp1.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i2IFv5HB016928;
	Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:57:05 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu
Message-Id: <p06020429bc7f762deb61@[128.113.24.47]>
In-Reply-To: <20040318151432.GA23925@regency.nsu.ru>
References: <200403172246.i2HMkw9v041299@repoman.freebsd.org>
 <20040318151432.GA23925@regency.nsu.ru>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:57:04 -0500
To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@nsu.ru>,
	Garance A Drosehn <gad@FreeBSD.org>
From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca)
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/ps ps.1 ps.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:57:06 -0000

At 9:14 PM +0600 3/18/04, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 17, 2004, Garance A Drosehn wrote:
>  >
>  >   Also adds support for <x> being a comma-separated list of
>  >   processes, and does a much better checking for invalid-values
>  >   of <x>, such as 'ps -p someword'.
>
>FWIW, what does POSIX/SUS say on this?  Does your commit bring us
>any closer here?

Yes.  SUSv3 indicates that '-p' should accept a list of processes,
and we used to only support a single process for it.  So, we are a
little closer.

-- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn            =   gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad@freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih@rpi.edu