From owner-freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org Tue Oct 29 00:58:17 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-toolchain@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D621162188 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:58:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472Cr86c6Mz3FLN for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E0C62162187; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:58:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: toolchain@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08DC162186 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 472Cr85dnMz3FLL for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A64B019F0C for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9T0wGLK042027 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:58:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x9T0wG5m042025 for toolchain@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:58:16 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 241550] Base Clang can't compile trivial CUDA programs: error: no matching function for call to '__isnan' Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:58:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable11? mfc-stable12? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status keywords bug_file_loc bug_severity flagtypes.name short_desc cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Maintenance of FreeBSD's integrated toolchain List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:58:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D241550 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open Keywords| |needs-patch URL| |https://reviews.llvm.org/D6 | |0220#1723350 Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Many People Flags| |mfc-stable11?, | |mfc-stable12? Summary|Base Clang can't compile |Base Clang can't compile |trivial CUDA program. |trivial CUDA programs: | |error: no matching function | |for call to '__isnan' CC| |dim@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak --- >From upstream review [1] "I think the right thing to do here would probably be to define a wrapper __isnan(double) which would call it." [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D60220#1723350 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=