Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 19:25:18 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, gerweck@yahoo.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports not found in INDEX Message-ID: <20021211032517.GA54699@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20021210213813.U71383-100000@m20.unixathome.org> References: <20021211023603.GA51386@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20021210213813.U71383-100000@m20.unixathome.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 09:39:46PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: > > The CVS repository contains the history, and ports that are > > repo-copied are identical to the port they were copied from, so they > > appear to have the "wrong" history. >=20 > How can I tell from the cvs repo which ports are supposed to be in the > INDEX and which aren't? How can I tell that it is deliberate that these > ports are not in INDEX? Is it just stored in someone's head somewhere? If a port has been deliberately disconnected from the build (see CVS logs), or has been repo-copied but not yet upgraded (again, see CVS logs), then it will not appear in the INDEX. All ports that are connected to the tree appear in the INDEX. Kris --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE99rAaWry0BWjoQKURApxQAJ45BSznA1cDBbqulQ/XqWszqB7tsQCdHalu NN9gvlTv8YRWpe5bt4nKqYo= =LlRC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021211032517.GA54699>