From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 13 11:57:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720AB16A41F for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:57:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rubenl@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0972643D5C for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:57:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rubenl@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from axelds.demon.nl ([83.160.138.74]:6565 helo=abubbletprpdda) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Em8mH-000I9A-Pt for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:57:05 +0000 From: "Ruben Bloemgarten" To: Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 12:56:36 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <44irtu74q8.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Thread-Index: AcX/KuSqZK1w+yzZTQ2YfDNob2fdIgAAQjew Message-Id: <20051213115706.0972643D5C@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: resolve appends domain section of hostname to non-existent domains X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ruben@bloemgarten.demon.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:57:07 -0000 It is, combined with a wildcard in dns. Thanks for the input. -----Original Message----- From: lowell@be-well.ilk.org [mailto:lowell@be-well.ilk.org] On Behalf Of Lowell Gilbert Sent: December 12, 2005 3:47 PM To: ruben@bloemgarten.demon.nl Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: resolve appends domain section of hostname to non-existent domains "Ruben Bloemgarten" writes: > Hi all, > > > > Could anyone let me know what's misconfigured here: > > > > When I ping from say server2 # ping jkhdsfkhdsafhjsahfdhksa.com I get the > following reply : > > > > PING jkhdsfkhdsafhjsahfdhksa.com.mydomain2.com (ip.of.server.1): 56 data > bytes > > > > 64 bytes from ip.of.server.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.594 ms > > 64 bytes from ip.of.server.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.427 ms > > > > The same happens from server1; it appends it's domain name to the incorrect > domain > > > > # ping jkhdsfkhdsafhjsahfdhksa.com > > > > PING jkhdsfkhdsafhjsahfdhksa.com.mydomain1.com (ip.of.server.1): 56 data > bytes > > > > 64 bytes from ip.of.server.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.594 ms > > 64 bytes from ip.of.server.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.427 ms > > > > > > Server2 is running multiple jails behind ipf/ipnat on 5.4-Release. > > Server1 is not running jails or ipf/nat. on 5.2.1-Current > > > > Server1 responds on both systems, which are in the same subnet at the same > colo. > > > > A dig from both systems does reply correctly, stating that > jkhdsfkhdsafhjsahfdhksa.com does not exist. Which leads me to feel that it > would most probably be hosts file related. As the hosts file on both systems > are not doing anything weird i.e.: > > Server2: ip.natted.lan server2 server2.mydomain2.com server2.mydomain2.com. > > Server1: ip.static.wan server1 server1.mydomain1.com server2.mydomain2.com. > > > > Although, as dns has already taken place (on existing domains it does > resolve correctly), it would seem that something is happening after > hosts->dns-> (not using nis). > > > > > Isn't this just the search parameter for resolv.conf(5)? -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/197 - Release Date: 12/09/2005 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.13.13/197 - Release Date: 12/09/2005