From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 10 20:20:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332B8120; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:20:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from poyopoyo@puripuri.plala.or.jp) Received: from msa01b.plala.or.jp (msa01.plala.or.jp [IPv6:2400:7800:0:5010::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BCDE39; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:20:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from i58-95-249-45.s02.a026.ap.plala.or.jp ([58.95.249.45]) by msa01b.plala.or.jp with ESMTP id <20130310202042.PXJC28512.msa01b.plala.or.jp@i58-95-249-45.s02.a026.ap.plala.or.jp>; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 05:20:42 +0900 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 05:20:42 +0900 Message-ID: <86k3pfm2g5.wl%poyopoyo@puripuri.plala.or.jp> From: poyopoyo@puripuri.plala.or.jp To: David Naylor Subject: Re: [RFC] lang/pypy In-Reply-To: <1636309.rWBjBGS5Mg@dragon.dg> References: <201303021657.27745.dbn@freebsd.org> <86mwucmvo4.wl%poyopoyo@puripuri.plala.or.jp> <1636309.rWBjBGS5Mg@dragon.dg> Mail-Followup-To: David Naylor , python@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler , Bryan Drewery , poyopoyo@puripuri.plala.or.jp User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-2022-JP-2?B?R29qGyQoRCtXGyhC?=) APEL/10.8 Emacs/24.2 (amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-VirusScan: Outbound; msa01b; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 05:20:42 +0900 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler , python@freebsd.org, Bryan Drewery X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 20:20:52 -0000 Hi David, At Sun, 10 Mar 2013 21:18:12 +0300, David Naylor wrote: > > however my translation processes under -DPYPY_IGNORE_MEMORY take 2GB > > for normal binary and 2.5GB for sandboxed one so they aggregate 4.5GB > > to run parallel. > > This is good news. Could you please detail how you measured peak memory? I > might need to retest the port. I heuristically measured them with top(1) RESources, amount of ZFS ARC and swap increased. Oh and free memory after one of translation process finised. I'm afraid I couldn't provide reproducible method for environments for others. > I'll disable the test for now and revise my estimation. Thanks for reporting > back. I wonder where so much difference of memory usage between yours and mine comes from. 5.5GB vs 2.5GB on the same platform (64bit/pypy) is not so negligible. -- Kuro PS. like this, please. thanks for the offer.