Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 09:55:48 +0200
From: Andy Hauser <andy-freebsd@splashground.de>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
Subject: Re: ${INSTALL_COOKIE} and shared /usr/ports
Message-ID: <20030905075548.GA12411@splashground.de>
In-Reply-To: <20030905031856.GH68249@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>
References: <20030905023313.GG68249@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <3F57FF22.6070906@fillmore-labs.com> <20030905031856.GH68249@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 05:18:57AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> # eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com / 2003-09-05 05:12:34 +0200:
> > Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> >
> > >Could ${INSTALL_COOKIE} include the hostname? If you do make install on
> > >one box, and then want to install the port on another one that has the
> > >/usr/ports tree nfs-mounted, it'll report that the port is already
> > >installed. [...]
> >
> > export /usr/ports read only and put
> > WRKDIRPREFIX=/var/tmp
> > in make.conf(5)
>
> that would defeat the purpose: avoiding another compilation.
But then why not make a package?
portupgrade -p
or
make package
and on the slave machines you could
mount /usr/ports/packages
and do
portupgrade -PP
aha
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030905075548.GA12411>