From owner-freebsd-chat Wed May 15 8:24:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from williams.mc.vanderbilt.edu (williams.mc.Vanderbilt.Edu [160.129.208.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6D1237B404 for ; Wed, 15 May 2002 08:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 28007 invoked by uid 19192); 15 May 2002 15:24:47 -0000 Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 10:24:46 -0500 To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: internal hosts in email Message-ID: <20020515152446.GW16671@williams.mc.vanderbilt.edu> References: <3CE2702A.A67642FE@centtech.com> <20020515150303.GU16671@williams.mc.vanderbilt.edu> <3CE27B5F.EB6D7F4F@centtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CE27B5F.EB6D7F4F@centtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i X-GPG-Key: 0x727A9DD2 (http://drew.rain3s.net/pubkey.asc) From: Drew Raines Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.55+ Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Eric Anderson wrote: > > True, it alone is not security, and I'm not betting the ranch on it > (nor would I ever). On the other hand, less information is a good > thing when it comes to your internal nets. No, you're betting the ranch on your firewall. Someone would gain intimate knowledge of your internal network anyway should they compromise it. Your SMTP headers are not the source of concern. The only one who'll care about is them is you when you need them. -- Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message