From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 31 11:27:34 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3048116A41B for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:27:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wawa@yandex-team.ru) Received: from relanium.yandex.ru (relanium.yandex.ru [213.180.193.88]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F80F13C4AA for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:27:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wawa@yandex-team.ru) Received: from [87.250.227.205] (v3-227-205.yandex.net [87.250.227.205]) by relanium.yandex.ru (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9VAvBnT083415 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:57:13 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from wawa@yandex-team.ru) Message-ID: <47285F7B.7010809@yandex-team.ru> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:56:59 +0300 From: Vladimir Ivanov Organization: Yandex LLC User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071023) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jack Vogel References: <2a41acea0710301317w8e820f2pdbd7f3ca1e1f6a30@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0710301317w8e820f2pdbd7f3ca1e1f6a30@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Mail Servers on relanium.yandex.ru host X-Antivirus-Code: 100000 Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD Stable List Subject: Re: em watchdogs - OS involvement X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:27:34 -0000 Jack Vogel wrote: > Things just keep getting stranger... its no wonder I didn't see this... > > I had been trying to repro the watchdog on a machine in my cube at work > without success, but in the test Lab they were successful. I scratched my > head for a while wondering why... > > But then I realized I had the Sept snapshot in my cube, reinstalled it to > the Oct snapshot and now it watchdogs like a champ too..... > > Another bit of data, if I define DEVICE_POLLING on the Oct. snap it > also will work. > > SOOOOO, what changes were made to interrupts between Sept and > October, something I need to do perhaps that wasnt done?? > > Any ideas?? Shared irq is a very big problem w/FAST_INTR seems to be. There are a lot of drops if ethernet shares IRQ w/UHCI e.g. Maybe you've seen this issue. > > Jack > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"