From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 11:04:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B28816A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:04:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-relay.tamu.edu (smtp-relay.tamu.edu [165.91.143.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C76843D46 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:04:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tyler@tamu.edu) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (c66.190.109.169.ts46v-01.rckprt.tx.charter.com [66.190.109.169]) (authenticated bits=0)iBNB3xCZ047354 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Dec 2004 05:04:01 -0600 (CST) From: "R. Tyler Ballance" To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-FmdnBONjLd88xSlEUhOP" Message-Id: <1103799791.7216.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 05:03:11 -0600 cc: stephen.paskaluk@gmail.com Subject: Possible long double bug fix (Problem Report sparc64/55773) X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:04:06 -0000 --=-FmdnBONjLd88xSlEUhOP Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable sap@ (of the MirOS project) has come up with a patch to fix this bug, which in my rudimentary testing on my Ultra2 seems to prove that it works.=20 The .diff file can be found here: http://dero.tamu.edu/~tyler/code/freebsd/fpu_qp.diff And the two tiny test programs we used to test it out are: http://dero.tamu.edu/~tyler/code/freebsd/long_double_test.c http://dero.tamu.edu/~tyler/code/freebsd/long_double_test2.c If somebody could also test this with programs that are affected, such as ports/net/isc-dhcp3-server referenced in the audit-trail on the bug-report (here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dsparc64/55773) (which i'll be testing later today, time permitting) Suggestions, and/or corrections welcomed ;) -R. Tyler Ballance --=-FmdnBONjLd88xSlEUhOP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUAQcql7egkwzi+drJUAQLAuw/+PBuTtqEcI3M8Mf10jpyEgEZwP3frCueI Hz4eEMbvUj55BAe+pOgl4F5F+AqIGbijXEzQ+OKXKYVLzG+Sp/WnUuqeoopcANHi eQqUnslNU6r/iNu3qRn4cYDpz5Y6f18QLp/USR31rx0nZy3drwSZRVyZ+64RQ6jM 1jRs2vd0Ypr+E7i48+lIHUP8NiouJYLWidvq4dsfMuAe+4Q97cIkHogQ1s/WMDaP f7+xTu6Q45xg+BMldv9KxB2FpyvXZSuGyEJNrsbyS8XGCdycNQWdIL5UppAMVJUn 3jJsjGNBiroeU/STQCE+ykhbBW9oqnh/zDZ1Cukz4Ov9AoKq94AKj+vy/2h00PD1 axAfgz6qvxbtlwwIqnrnW8hC+fcNUEs3cgAUCJrw9cFtIDUQJkVTzMKNxNy96vdQ TuopFjpj8SRmbSrSd2j8/XXJ3/B88XoNGLkyf2dq6/JA7lxh8Mbr0AvqBvRaLt3k ADNYsutWTMd3SpDTNZeNM3qyR3xtSRGytp2IgwBfNRZw/Fy/Acf36zliVzAI9Om5 ACrYVNr11HllYKp13bPmdMdYb7XirmQNHJhTaBDWqSsxcv1sk1AKn0N1uuXPy5Za tOCsX/K2XfKVouBGlw5uvOwpeiIYKOS9xd/u7htWVV0VnOEiL6tDrLC3wH3ZDpyQ 6yp/MV1bPis= =O/G1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-FmdnBONjLd88xSlEUhOP--