From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 17 16:20:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08659106566C for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@freebsd.org) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C568FC21 for ; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:20:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.61.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32853B754; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q8HGKlRR063171; Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:20:47 GMT (envelope-from phk@freebsd.org) To: Zhihao Yuan From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:07:00 EST." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:20:47 +0000 Message-ID: <63170.1347898847@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers , Lorenzo Cogotti Subject: Re: Providing a default graphical environment on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 16:20:49 -0000 In message , Zhihao Yuan writes: >On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message , Lorenzo Cogotti writ >> es: >>>Hi, >>>I was wondering about the possibility of FreeBSD to provide an official >>>supported graphical environment. >> >> We already do: It's called "X11" :-) > >How about Wikipedia "graphical environment" before u say this? How about you try to install ports/x11-vm/twm, turn your CPU speed down to 20 MHz and get a good feel for how a graphical environment felt 25 years ago, before you make a fool of yourself ? :-) There is no way that FreeBSD is going to annoint a canonical window manager (look that up too!), we've been down that road before and the landscape is ugly and filled with bikesheds. My suggest was 100% serious: Assume X11 _is_ the graphical environment, pick a toolkit which is written to work with any window manager, which all good toolkits are, and move on. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.