From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 22 06:11:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31E2A57A; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 06:11:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from st11p02mm-asmtp001.mac.com (st11p02mm-asmtpout001.mac.com [17.172.220.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06CD42D8B; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 06:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fukuyama.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (unknown [73.162.13.215]) by st11p02mm-asmtp001.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.33.0 64bit (built Aug 27 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0NGY002VLZUJLJ20@st11p02mm-asmtp001.mac.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 2014 06:11:09 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.13.68,1.0.33,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-12-22_01:2014-12-19,2014-12-21,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1412080000 definitions=main-1412220069 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) Subject: Re: simple task to speed up booting From: Rui Paulo In-reply-to: <1419224743.1018.108.camel@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 22:11:06 -0800 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: References: <43445.1418553160@critter.freebsd.dk> <1419224743.1018.108.camel@freebsd.org> To: Ian Lepore X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:29:10 +0000 Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 06:11:12 -0000 On Dec 21, 2014, at 21:05, Ian Lepore wrote: > So all in all it seems like different kinds of IO need different > throttling, something like the attached (which also still has some = stats > output in it). I can't decide if it's worth committing... it'll have = a > lot of value to someone with slow serial and netbooting, is that = common? I think it's common. It really depends on whether you can live with it = or not. Most people either change the baud rate or live with it.=20 I think the rate of printing is pretty excessive and this patch seems to = fix that, so why not commit it? -- Rui Paulo