Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2007 13:29:11 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Ricardo Correia <rcorreia@wizy.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base. Message-ID: <20070406112911.GC1251@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <4615D28D.8030909@wizy.org> References: <20070406025700.GB98545@garage.freebsd.pl> <4615D28D.8030909@wizy.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--adJ1OR3c6QgCpb/j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 05:54:37AM +0100, Ricardo Correia wrote: > I'm interested in the cross-platform portability of ZFS pools, so I have > one question: did you implement the Solaris ZFS whole-disk support > (specifically, the creation and recognition of the EFI/GPT label)? >=20 > Unfortunately some tools in Linux (parted and cfdisk) have trouble > recognizing the EFI partition created by ZFS/Solaris.. I'm not yet setup to move disks between FreeBSD and Solaris, but my first goal was to integrate it with FreeBSD's GEOM framework. We support cache flushing operations on any GEOM provider (disk, partition, slice, anything disk-like), so bascially currently I treat everything as a whole disk (because I simply can), but don't do any EFI/GPT labeling. I'll try to move data from Solaris' disk to FreeBSD and see what happen. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --adJ1OR3c6QgCpb/j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGFi8HForvXbEpPzQRAqkkAKDoeFVtTc0mTpQX1p+3b/K6H6NfjgCfdJOR SQwudd1BSO/2tsivsqBPBlI= =M1fQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --adJ1OR3c6QgCpb/j--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070406112911.GC1251>