From owner-freebsd-current Thu Sep 10 07:13:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA00370 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 10 Sep 1998 07:13:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from tim.xenologics.com (tim.xenologics.com [194.77.5.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA00344 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 1998 07:13:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from seggers@semyam.dinoco.de) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by tim.xenologics.com (8.8.5/8.8.8) with UUCP id QAA25020; Thu, 10 Sep 1998 16:06:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from semyam.dinoco.de (semyam.dinoco.de [127.0.0.1]) by semyam.dinoco.de (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA02996; Thu, 10 Sep 1998 09:04:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from seggers@semyam.dinoco.de) Message-Id: <199809100704.JAA02996@semyam.dinoco.de> To: Amancio Hasty cc: Mike Smith , current@FreeBSD.ORG, seggers@semyam.dinoco.de Subject: Re: ELF worldstone (etc.) In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 09 Sep 1998 19:08:41 PDT." <199809100208.TAA07610@rah.star-gate.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 09:04:26 +0200 From: Stefan Eggers Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >Perhaps significantly, mean CPU > >utilisation was only a little over 200% for both worldstones. > ^^^^^ I hope you meant 20%. Why do you hope that? That would mean one of the four Xeon CPUs being working just 20% of the time or in other words the system were just using 1/20th of its CPU power. I'd prefer 400% here as then all CPUs were busy all the time. With 200% its just using half its potential. Stefan. -- Stefan Eggers Lu4 yao2 zhi1 ma3 li4, Max-Slevogt-Str. 1 ri4 jiu3 jian4 ren2 xin1. 51109 Koeln Federal Republic of Germany To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message