From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Feb 13 11:00:22 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id LAA11178 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 13 Feb 1995 11:00:22 -0800 Received: from dns.netvision.net.il (root@dns.NetVision.net.il [194.90.1.5]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA11172 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 1995 11:00:10 -0800 Received: from ugen.NetManage.co.il (ugen.netmanage.co.il [192.114.78.165]) by dns.netvision.net.il (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id UAA27328; Mon, 13 Feb 1995 20:59:16 +0200 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 95 20:56:36 IST From: "Ugen J.S.Antsilevich" Subject: Re: Network gurus: How hard to split bandwidth across modems? To: Jon Cargille , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Nate Williams X-Mailer: Chameleon 4.00-Arm-25, TCP/IP for Windows, NetManage Inc. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >> I've been wondering how hard would it be to convince FreeBSD to route >> packets (possibly bound for a single host) across two different >> point-to-point links as bandwidth is available? >> > >Jordan posted something about this when I was down in San Francisco a >few weeks back. There are patches on the BSDi site that do this for >BSDi that *might* be portable to FreeBSD if a little bit of hacking was >done. I haven't looked at them myself, but they're worth checking out. Hmm...let's say we have ppp0 and ppp1 both 28.8 to some lae where we have another box 28.8... Can't we define on our box route add default and on the box on the second side: route add Wouldn't this one work? -- -=Ugen J.S.Antsilevich=- NetVision - Israeli Commercial Internet | Learning E-mail: ugen@NetVision.net.il | To Fly. [c] Phone : +972-4-550330 |