From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Feb 20 20:30:25 1995
Return-Path: questions-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id UAA07480 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 20 Feb 1995 20:30:25 -0800
Received: from nsk.kodak.com (nsk.kodak.com [150.220.251.149]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id UAA07467 for <questions@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 20 Feb 1995 20:30:22 -0800
Received: by nsk.kodak.com id AA07033
  (5.67b+/IDA-1.5 for <questions@FreeBSD.org>); Mon, 20 Feb 1995 23:25:41 -0500
Received: from khis_ns.khis.kodak.com(192.232.112.2) by nsk.kodak.com via smap (V1.3)
	id sma007031; Mon Feb 20 23:25:25 1995
Received: from dal-gw.dal.khis.Kodak.COM by khis_ns.khis.kodak.com with SMTP id AA01469
  (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for <questions@FreeBSD.org>); Mon, 20 Feb 1995 23:30:43 -0500
Received: from alamo.dal.khis.kodak.com by dal-gw.dal.khis.kodak.com with SMTP id AA02208
  (5.65c/IDA-1.5 for questions@FreeBSD.org); Mon, 20 Feb 1995 22:27:52 -0600
Received: from scotty.khis.com by alamo.dal.khis.kodak.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA05772; Mon, 20 Feb 95 22:29:08 CST
From: wardd@khis.Kodak.COM (Doug Ward)
Message-Id: <9502210429.AA05772@alamo.dal.khis.kodak.com>
Subject: ENOMSG not in <sys/errno.h>
To: questions@FreeBSD.org
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 1995 22:29:06 -0600 (CST)
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 283       
Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

If I have not already said it, FreeBSD is *GREAT*!  There now I have said it.
I am wondering if I should enter a bug report about ENOMSG being missing
from <sys/errno.h>.  Is this a bug or intentional?  The reason I ask is that
INTRO(2) makes no mention of ENOMSG but MSGOP(2) does.