Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 10:56:11 -0500 From: Kutulu <kutulu@kutulu.org> To: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gettext vs gettext-devel Message-ID: <20020312105611.B11787@pr0n.kutulu.org> In-Reply-To: <a6l5nm$2fh1$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>; from naddy@mips.inka.de on Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 03:09:42PM %2B0000 References: <20020310034141.GA16921@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> <1015751079.509.9.camel@notebook> <a6l5nm$2fh1$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 03:09:42PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > No, we can't use only one, because some ports only work with older one, > > while some only with newer one, therefore we need both to make everyone > > happy. > > What are the problems? > FWIW, I know that during my many attemps to build GNOME from the meta port, I was forced to cd into some sub-ports po directory and specifically run the old version of msgfmt against some message catalog, as the -new version that ran by default was failing. gettext is not something I've wrapped myself around yet, so I don't know how trivially easy those problems would be to fix, but I would think that if they were trivial they would have been fixed already? --K To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020312105611.B11787>