From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct  1 12:34:38 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1388D9
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed,  1 Oct 2014 12:34:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.iXsystems.com (mail.ixsystems.com [12.229.62.4])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.ixsystems.com",
 Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D627EDC1
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Wed,  1 Oct 2014 12:34:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (mail.ixsystems.com [10.2.55.1])
 by mail.iXsystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F627F9C6;
 Wed,  1 Oct 2014 05:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.iXsystems.com ([10.2.55.1])
 by localhost (mail.ixsystems.com [10.2.55.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 26226-01; Wed,  1 Oct 2014 05:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.8.0.38] (unknown [10.8.0.38])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.iXsystems.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 878F57F9BF;
 Wed,  1 Oct 2014 05:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1988\))
Subject: Re: HAST with broken HDD
From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@mail.turbofuzz.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+dUSypO8xTR3sh_KSL9c9FLxbGH+bTR9-gPdcCVd+t0UgUF-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 15:34:33 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <15E8A3A7-2CFA-43F0-B9DB-1B0DBAB5304C@mail.turbofuzz.com>
References: <542BC135.1070906@Skynet.be> <542BDDB3.8080805@internetx.com>
 <CA+dUSypO8xTR3sh_KSL9c9FLxbGH+bTR9-gPdcCVd+t0UgUF-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: George Kontostanos <gkontos.mail@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1988)
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, JF-Bogaerts <JF-Bogaerts@skynet.be>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 12:34:39 -0000


> On Oct 1, 2014, at 3:28 PM, George Kontostanos =
<gkontos.mail@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you saying that the pool will appear to be optimal even with a bad =
drive?

Yes.  HAST means that ZFS won=E2=80=99t *see* a bad drive.  It will just =
continue to see =E2=80=9Ca drive=E2=80=9D even though one half of the =
HAST pair has died.

- Jordan