From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 14 20:33:27 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3F716A418 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gore_jarold@yahoo.com) Received: from web63008.mail.re1.yahoo.com (web63008.mail.re1.yahoo.com [69.147.96.219]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 107CB13C45A for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:33:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gore_jarold@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 85742 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Aug 2007 20:33:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=n01ToqrbyOhkD/CLucNP1hP+HkVX96d8j3ikyNOb+fpxuFEGtZkYlR+Kxz4xkbRP+9y8T33esBKbMyw9xP6oqqUBQzsoJdbzcRPzG4RnlKBR/cDyoJ+qxhgTAHe7cdkHV01WDTEBKGuGpt2IyfQ9pPHTlPmnxMKv+JbXTLYCp54=; X-YMail-OSG: xkpstQ0VM1mhBh0SFeWQrL9kX5n5C3kjUY7HI4ezGTIj4h_3lJ.4hUbHnSM0Ow3iemQFs.7tsfFU23x4ztuzf9Dx8XazxGq.yqYMx1X8dx4rD9b_QsmJRz10lPH6VI9A Received: from [71.63.232.32] by web63008.mail.re1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:33:26 PDT Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:33:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Gore Jarold To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <186173.85039.qm@web63008.mail.re1.yahoo.com> Cc: ivoras@fer.hr Subject: Re: help needed - tuning a filesystem for rm and cp ? (MORE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:33:27 -0000 On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Ivan Voras wrote: > Gore Jarold wrote: > > > vfs.ufs.dirhash_maxmem: 2097152 > > vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem: 2065716 > > > > > > Interesting at all ? > > Yes, you've used up all dirhash_mem. Since you have enough memory, try > increasing dirhash_maxmem by a factor of 4 or more and testing again. It > might help you with large directories (lots of files). Ok, you are correct - I am indeed maxing out vfs.ufs.dirhash_mem I have just upped it by 2x and will continue to monitor it. Here is a question for any and all out there reading ... what would you expect would happen to a system that was constantly maxing out this value, sometimes on a sustained basis, while the activity that caused it went on uninterrupted ? I am seeing the system halt ... is it reasonable to think that maxing that value out on a regular, sustained basis would cause a system to halt ? (6.2-release running on a 4 GB memory p4 xeon ... does nothing but fileserver duties) ____________________________________________________________________________________ Need a vacation? Get great deals to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel. http://travel.yahoo.com/