From owner-freebsd-bugs Thu Jun 20 8:15: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from gatekeeper.orem.verio.net (gatekeeper.orem.verio.net [192.41.0.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC84D37B401 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 08:15:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guppy.dmz.orem.verio.net (guppy.dmz.orem.verio.net [10.1.1.55]) by gatekeeper.orem.verio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416EF3BF11E for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 09:15:01 -0600 (MDT) Received: by guppy.dmz.orem.verio.net; Thu, 20 Jun 2002 09:15:01 -0600 (MDT) To: Robert Drehmel , freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/39547: SVR4 calls chgproccnt with the wrong argument References: <200206201100.g5KB09X53647@freefall.freebsd.org> From: Jamie Gritton Date: 20 Jun 2002 09:15:01 -0600 In-Reply-To: Robert Drehmel's message of "Thu, 20 Jun 2002 04:00:09 -0700 (PDT)" Message-ID: Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Robert Drehmel writes: > it seems this was fixed in revision 1.20 of > 'src/sys/compat/svr4/svr4_misc.c'. > Can you tell me at which revision you are looking at? 1.13.2.2 (from 4.6-RELEASE), in the old sys/svr4 location. I guess I should have looked at current, but I didn't even consider the possibility that such a simple fix wouldn't have been MFC'd (in six months!). The commit message for 1.20 is telling: | Take 10 seconds to actually fix the chgproccnt rather than just make it | explicitly error. If the module is horribly broken, it should be | temporarily removed from src/sys/modules. - Jamie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message