Date: Wed, 31 Jan 1996 12:44:08 -0800 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> Cc: chuck@fang.cs.sunyit.edu, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any interest in Quickcam Driver Message-ID: <199601312044.MAA00880@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 31 Jan 1996 10:17:04 PST." <199601311817.KAA06853@precipice.shockwave.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
You guys shall try to focus your effors in a small mailing list ...
We get too much mail on this mailing list so people may miss a
posting related to the Quickam stuff..
Amancio
>>> Paul Traina said:
>
> From: chuck@fang.cs.sunyit.edu
> Subject: Re: Any interest in Quickcam Driver
> On Jan 30, 11:31pm, Paul Traina wrote:
>
> Not to belittle the effort that Paul LaFollette went to to do his port,
> I think it would be more benifitial to wait and use the driver Paul Traina
> is working on. This way any and all work on Quickcam applications can be
> cross developed on FreeBSD and Linux.
>
> No, that's silly... we should really just grab the best _technical_ driver
> from all camps and insure that we all conform to the same driver API. I hav
e
> no idea how compatible mine is with the next-generation Linux driver that is
> in the works...hell, I didn't even know there _was_ a next generation linux
> driver API in the works until 5 minutes ago.
>
> Don't worry, by the time all of us get our code out the door, I'm sure there
> will be a TON of cross-polination.
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601312044.MAA00880>