From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 25 02:00:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E94616A42A; Wed, 25 May 2005 02:00:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6F643D4C; Wed, 25 May 2005 02:00:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([69.160.65.223]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with ESMTP id <20050525020050.PIYS13270.mta11.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Tue, 24 May 2005 22:00:50 -0400 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E411FB4FC; Tue, 24 May 2005 22:00:58 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 22:00:58 -0400 From: Parv To: Alexey Dokuchaev Message-ID: <20050525020058.GA966@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Alexey Dokuchaev , freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, cy@FreeBSD.org References: <200505241511.j4OFBuMV073443@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200505241511.j4OFBuMV073443@freefall.freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, cy@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/81440: Major improvements to x11-wm/fvwm2-devel port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 02:00:52 -0000 in message <200505241511.j4OFBuMV073443@freefall.freebsd.org>, wrote Alexey Dokuchaev thusly... > > Synopsis: Major improvements to x11-wm/fvwm2-devel port > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->cy > Responsible-Changed-By: danfe > Responsible-Changed-When: Tue May 24 15:11:37 GMT 2005 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Over to maintainer. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=81440 General *ARGH! CARP!* for the port being OPTION-ified. More importantly, to the PR originator, why "WITHOUT_XINERAMA ... is of little use"? Perhaps not to you, but i do use it. - Parv --