From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun May 23 0: 0: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9700314C1D for ; Sun, 23 May 1999 00:00:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id AAA90826; Sun, 23 May 1999 00:00:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 00:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199905230700.AAA90826@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Daniel C. Sobral" Subject: Re: kern/11266: Page fault, fatal trap in kernel Reply-To: "Daniel C. Sobral" Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR kern/11266; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Daniel C. Sobral" To: Nickolai Zeldovich Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kern/11266: Page fault, fatal trap in kernel Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 15:56:56 +0900 Nickolai Zeldovich wrote: > > I suddenly noticed that 3.2-STABLE was released, and was wondering if this > bug has been possibly fixed? I'm not sure if I want to install it on our > production news box just to find this out, and none of our non-critical > machines have the same load and specs. In my last message I suggested a bigger NMBCLUSTER. Did you try that? Also, nothing can be done about panic PRs without a kernel trace, at the very least. I can't tell you if the bug has been fixed because I don't know what the bug is. Read the section on the handbook on how to debug a kernel. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message