From owner-freebsd-security Thu Aug 31 14:38:29 1995 Return-Path: security-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id OAA25889 for security-outgoing; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 14:38:29 -0700 Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA25883 for ; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 14:38:27 -0700 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA12750; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 14:37:49 -0700 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199508312137.OAA12750@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: Eric Allman's syslog.c fixes To: peter@haywire.dialix.com (Peter Wemm) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 14:37:49 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <42548i$agm$1@haywire.DIALix.COM> from "Peter Wemm" at Sep 1, 95 03:58:10 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 703 Sender: security-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > Eric Allman is running a new syslog.c through the mill at the > moment. It'll be the one published in the RSN CERT advisory I presume. > > It's thought to be bomproof on 4.4BSD systems (it uses vsnprintf), and > the only holdup is portability to other OS's. > > I keep a pretty close eye on this area, as it's sendmail related. Is > it worth bringing in the currently 'endorsed' version, and updating it > to the CERT version if there are any changes later? Yes, that would give Eric additional test data and eyes looking at the solution. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD