From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 22 12:37:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 580DA22D for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CA17B58 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t2MCb50L033074 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:37:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 198743] [UPDATE] chinese/fcitx to 4.2.8.5 as well as its addons Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:37:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: robak@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 12:37:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198743 Bartek Rutkowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |Rejected Status|Open |Closed --- Comment #5 from Bartek Rutkowski --- (In reply to lichray from comment #4) If you have updates to some ports, you should have indicated that in the PR subject and a proper description, because current one does indicate its a duplicate. Secondly, pointing to a github repo is not the pereferred way to proposing changes, please upload separate diffs for respective ports. In addition to that, you should also upload a poudriere logs from testing each change you're proposing, if you want your PR's to be actioned sooner than later. And the last thing, please avoid creating one PR for more than one port changes, it should be a PR per port and when there are any dependencies amongst them then relevant fields like depends/blocks should be set up accordingly. I hope this clears out any confusion and that you now know what to do, to get things done - I am still closing this PR, because it is not created accordingly to the above requirements, hope you understand. Kind regards, Bartek Rutkowski -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.