Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:25:11 -0400 From: Parv <parv@pair.com> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-wm/fvwm2-devel Makefile pkg-plist ports/x11-wm/fvwm2-devel/files patch-configure Message-ID: <20050914222511.GA11455@holestein.holy.cow> In-Reply-To: <20050914061957.GA13354@FreeBSD.org> References: <200509132211.j8DMBYpj090708@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050914022354.GA7740@holestein.holy.cow> <20050914061957.GA13354@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
in message <20050914061957.GA13354@FreeBSD.org>, wrote Alexey Dokuchaev thusly... > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 10:23:54PM -0400, Parv wrote: > > in message <200509132211.j8DMBYpj090708@repoman.freebsd.org>, > > wrote Alexey Dokuchaev thusly... > > > > > > Log: > > > - Convert to OPTIONS > > > > Ah dang. > > Once again, could you please explain what you do not like about OPTIONS? > If you need to reconfigure the port at some point, there's "make config" > for this purpose. I was just expressing my general disappointment as in "another one bites the dust". The issue of OPTIONS-fying has been covered in past definitely by others, and i might have chimed in too. > > > - Add WITH_RPLAY knob, kill WITHOUT_XINERAMA since it was of > > > little use > > > > Whatever. > > As I said earlier, it does not hurt to have it: there's no extra > dependency, and this simplifies things for people. > me with example when using this option is the onl I am sorry, that was bad edit on my part, i should have removed "WITH_RPLAY" reference when i replied. Again, I was expressing my disappointment about the removal of WITHOUT_XINERAMA (why/how was already covered either in some PR of one of the ports lists). - Parv --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050914222511.GA11455>