From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 18:44:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2F816A420 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:44:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmendler@ucla.edu) Received: from smtp-1.smtp.ucla.edu (smtp-1.smtp.ucla.edu [169.232.46.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E52E43D78 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:44:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmendler@ucla.edu) Received: from mail.ucla.edu (mail.ucla.edu [169.232.47.146]) by smtp-1.smtp.ucla.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1RIiFXR008594; Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:44:15 -0800 Received: from debian (ca-stmnca-cuda4-gen2k1-186.vnnyca.adelphia.net [70.33.90.186]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.ucla.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k1RIiF4V026817 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:44:15 -0800 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:44:56 -0800 From: Jordan Mendler To: Andrew Pantyukhin References: <1141002856l.6908l.0l@debian> In-Reply-To: (from infofarmer@gmail.com on Mon Feb 27 02:07:29 2006) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.3.8 Message-Id: <1141065896l.6772l.0l@debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; DelSp=Yes; Format=Flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Probable-Spam: no X-Spam-Report: none X-Scanned-By: smtp.ucla.edu on 169.232.46.136 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 install: Cannot dump. No dump device found... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:44:22 -0000 > 2. Google for known issues for your motherboard and your > other hardware It seems that even though the Sil 3112 SATA (on board) controller on my =20 motherboard uses is supposed to be supported by FreeBSD, that is very =20 blotchy. I guess thats what it is, so does this mean I just have to =20 wait for a newer version of FreeBSD and hope it gains better support =20 for it? Or is there any other way to workaround it? I tried all the other suggestions and still have the same problem. Thanks, Jordan