From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 12 12:40:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0822516A4CE for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 12:40:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94E543D4C for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 12:40:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBCCeTMs082333 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 12:40:29 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iBCCeT5K082332; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 12:40:29 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 12:40:29 GMT Message-Id: <200412121240.iBCCeT5K082332@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Roland Smith Subject: Re: amd64/74669: The port math/octave is marked BROKEN on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Roland Smith List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 12:40:30 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/74669; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Roland Smith To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/74669: The port math/octave is marked BROKEN on amd64 Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 13:31:29 +0100 --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I sent the following to David, but I forgot to Cc gnats. :-( ----- Forwarded message from Roland Smith ----- Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 23:27:51 +0100 From: Roland Smith Organization: Me, organized? To: David O'Brien Subject: Re: amd64/74669: The port math/octave is marked BROKEN on amd64 On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 01:59:26PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 02:54:23PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > > post-install: > > +.if ${ARCH} !=3D "amd64" > > ${RM} ${PREFIX}/bin/octave > > @${CP} ${FILESDIR}/octave ${WRKDIR} > > @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's,%%PREFIX%%,${PREFIX},g ; \ > > s,%%OCTAVE_VERSION%%,${OCTAVE_VERSION},g' \ > > ${WRKDIR}/octave > > ${INSTALL_SCRIPT} ${WRKDIR}/octave ${PREFIX}/bin > > +.endif >=20 > Why does building statically vs. dynamically require this change? It is not so much a question of it being required, but this replacement of the octave link by a script that defines the shared library location isn't necessary when there are no shared libraries to load. :-) Meanwhile I've traced the compile problem to the libglob that is included with octave. See my second mail in the PR audit trail for a different and IMHO better fix. Roland --=20 R.F. Smith /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign r s m i t h @ x s 4 a l l . n l \ / No HTML/RTF in email http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ X No Word docs in email / \ Respect for open standards ----- End forwarded message ----- --=20 R.F. Smith /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign r s m i t h @ x s 4 a l l . n l \ / No HTML/RTF in email http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ X No Word docs in email / \ Respect for open standards --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBvDohEnfvsMMhpyURAicJAJwMsgjr4EVNdMOoi6LlImcUID6axgCfXCY+ pFakCN15MXsbMFHC81qylRY= =zxiN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/--