Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:24:07 -0500
From:      "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com>
To:        Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>, Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Misuse of PORTREVISION (Re: svn commit: r434379 - head/multimedia/x265)
Message-ID:  <17b5afa1-c0b4-a79e-aea1-d0ae918469e8@aldan.algebra.com>
In-Reply-To: <fee7b990-45db-1e52-22d8-fb1b21e9c030@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20170218210541.82AA915F6@freefall.freebsd.org> <f23cecfc-d669-e62b-1916-1e16e66fb3eb@aldan.algebra.com> <a9be8749-360f-15fb-aa75-93a378371c51@FreeBSD.org> <d5e81c35-41fe-4f5c-4f45-e069d93ce911@aldan.algebra.com> <fee7b990-45db-1e52-22d8-fb1b21e9c030@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21.02.2017 11:16, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> When using poudriere, you do not need to bump PORTREVISION, it will
> rebuild everything that needs rebuilding, and then, when you run pkg
> upgrade, pkg will force the reinstallation of packages because a
> dependencing shlib version was changed.
I thought so, thanks for the confirmation.
> Like I said, the problem is only with portmaster and portupgrade, not
> all our tools. I have used poudriere + pkg upgrade exclusively for 3+
> years, and never had a problem shlib version changes.
Why then is the bumping of PORTREVISION still mandatory? We are 
pessimizing things for the users of correctly-functioning tools to help 
those using the broken ones. And ensure, the broken tools will never be 
fixed all along.

    -mi





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17b5afa1-c0b4-a79e-aea1-d0ae918469e8>