Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:17:42 +0800 From: Martin Wilke <miwi@FreeBSD.org> To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <cmt@burggraben.net> Cc: Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r490910 - in head: Mk Mk/Uses mail/thunderbird www/firefox www/firefox-esr www/firefox-i18n www/firefox/files www/palemoon www/seamonkey Message-ID: <20190123021742.crxjjzlcvg3ly55k@miwitb.miwi.cc> In-Reply-To: <20190122205210.GA2480@elch.exwg.net> References: <201901212303.x0LN3jR3059519@repo.freebsd.org> <CAGBxaX=T7SvB6Ncm-0Drt1-HLED92xKuJ-LRvg%2BYsDFKrYCp4A@mail.gmail.com> <CAGBxaXmOibxw_q5Ev34oyiCetNRqNVLNY5VjQrJZFEFTy6nDhg@mail.gmail.com> <o989-8nt8-wny@FreeBSD.org> <20190122100911.GA77378@elch.exwg.net> <d0oo-fn3l-wny@FreeBSD.org> <20190122205210.GA2480@elch.exwg.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 09:52:11PM +0100, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## Jan Beich (jbeich@FreeBSD.org):
>
> > Looking at Try options[1] and automation[2] I'm not sure WAYLAND=off is
> > tested nowadays. In www/firefox WAYLAND=off has no effect[3] unless
> > x11-toolkits/gtk30 also has WAYLAND=off. I've reported the issue
> > upstream[4] but for now just locally remove files/patch-bug1514156.
> > If there's no fix in sight after actual release on 2019-01-29 then
> > the patch can be moved under WAYLAND_EXTRA_PATCHES.
>
> I personally don't mind having the wayland stuff around - from
> the log I gather I disabled it quite some time ago because it
> broke something ("glx/dri/whatever", sic) back in the days.
> Now it just works. And firefox 65 works, too.
>
> Given that WAYLAND is the default for us, and "without wayland"
> might be untested anyways - would it make sense to remove the
> WAYLAND option and force it to "on" always?
Correct me if I am wrong, WAYLAND is a X replacement which is not really working with FreeBSD atm.
Why should I/We install it when we dont use it? For me the only thing it does is increasing build time,
and for minimal desktops a useless dependency. Its already absurd enough to have 2 CLANG versions
on a desktop.
>
> Regards,
> Christoph
>
> --
> Spare Space
>
- --
+-----------------oOO--(_)--OOo-------------------------+
With best Regards,
Martin Wilke (miwi_(at)_FreeBSD.org)
Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEQDT3f1gnhUqwZk3nHz/GZTE6EmcFAlxHzsQACgkQHz/GZTE6
Emf5TQf+PwwXXFbSMCSFs32GpVpTyqOCufw9ZvnHuVFuCED9ljb53CChZmhVvurT
jLwS7jfywnIktnChQPnpTcdsZa+SbtfBwEebsUY/OUibjoDt0asaOy5GqeCxzxGJ
t9XeWVCQU6nvvZqGYAmDa7yFs5SJnn1kdobL9jaQWThK6+8MdtOCrM8MzpFzepbD
NR78jVz/rcgo0KNW8CUHKtaL0/psPGOJt/l5EpdzRyhtLXVMVGa74Gldp6JxaODF
+hUU7keuO+R8XgD+3NcQ6lB0jM3JrYm9pUXXAP4wv+yYUOnx2XVOdLQccdX0bf+q
0Vn25mcTy4fFb322tO3dsu5Mf6t8zA==
=xeL3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190123021742.crxjjzlcvg3ly55k>