From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 05:31:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7321316A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 05:31:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72A843FD7 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 05:31:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-chat-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2003112013314601300mlm3qe>; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:31:46 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 040D23A; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:31:45 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org References: <20031120013831.GT98272@klapaucius.zer0.org> <000c01c3af1e$b42e9fe0$6801a8c0@Nomad> <20031120072423.GA80697@xor.obsecurity.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 20 Nov 2003 08:31:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20031120072423.GA80697@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <44vfpfp3ni.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: SCO going after BSD??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 13:31:47 -0000 Kris Kennaway writes: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:28:04PM -0600, Minnesota Slinky wrote: > > > I talked to a couple of people who do beta testing for Microsoft and > > they said the issue came up a few years ago. According to them (one > > being my father), it has to do with security and virus protection. > > Again, this is second-hand, so take it for what it's worth... > > There's no possible sense in which this can be true. Plain text > attachments do not create a security or virus risk. You're just not being as creative as Microsoft's designers. They've managed to find a way.