Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:27:18 -0400
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
To:        Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Time to increase MAX_TASKS?
Message-ID:  <201208131127.18457.jhb@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <1344445163.2813.2.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com>
References:  <1342730963.2656.5.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com> <201208080725.24199.jhb@freebsd.org> <1344445163.2813.2.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, August 08, 2012 12:59:23 pm Sean Bruno wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 04:25 -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> > I meant that with the limit jacked up to something that silences the
> > warning
> > (such as 128), what is the max number of tasks queued?
> > 
> > 
> 
> I set debug.acpi.max_tasks=128 and added a temp log message to
> acpi_task_enqueue().  I see the system request *98* tasks according to
> my test on this new Dell box.  Is it possible that the queue really
> isn't running yet or something?

Yes, it isn't running during the first pass of probe and attach.

It would be good to know what the source of tasks besides acpi_cpuX devices 
was.

-- 
John Baldwin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201208131127.18457.jhb>