Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:24:25 +0000 From: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: rcvar function in rc.subr Message-ID: <4569DBD9.9060000@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20061126181422.GA66009@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <1161268403.89897.1.camel@mayday.esat.net> <20061126121907.GC60959@comp.chem.msu.su> <4569A113.5080106@FreeBSD.org> <20061126181422.GA66009@comp.chem.msu.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 02:13:39PM +0000, Florent Thoumie wrote: >> Yar Tikhiy wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 03:33:23PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote: >>>> Does anybody have a clue why /etc/rc.d/foo rcvar prints a leading '$' >>>> before the variable name? Doesn't make much sense with /bin/sh. >>> Sorry for the late reply. According to the CVS history, the code >>> was just imported from NetBSD. Perhaps it's too late to change it >>> as people are likely to have workarounds for it already. Of course, >>> $foo_enable=YES looks ugly and has a different meaning in sh(1). >> Well, it may be worth fixing in HEAD even if we don't MFC the change. > > Then just do it! Well, if no serious objections appear in a > reasonable period of time. Personally, I'm happy with the change Well, I just like discussing things before committing :-) -- Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFadvZMxEkbVFH3PQRCkQOAJ4vjO1mbb6BMaVbcvRSQ0fuuoUPRACeMMDY RKbe/fJnnxWQZWP0tP05be0= =Ht3j -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4569DBD9.9060000>