From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 1 09:35:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9926D16A407 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:35:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rosti.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D2F43CA7 for ; Fri, 1 Dec 2006 09:35:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rosti.bsd@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so2141608uge for ; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:35:44 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BcxIKJQ2b0fD29yvZAf73tUB2Dwf3+7ULwX1C22JV/3m7IKdIysBwKW7Ec0N3XX9eU5MSr+FdaFqNED/HaWSQC5cj9KQ7g02/bsm9twHCxcWEHqNab5xTMt/SHFLpBz7ZzIEFaDmt5e6i4KXmc3tXVLL7VO3ku4XoqQEFyWyC7Y= Received: by 10.78.83.13 with SMTP id g13mr4617788hub.1164965744247; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:35:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from saturn.lan ( [212.143.154.227]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 36sm28324122hub.2006.12.01.01.35.42; Fri, 01 Dec 2006 01:35:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 11:35:29 +0200 From: Rostislav Krasny To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20061201113529.e12a2fe7.rosti.bsd@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.10 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: wrong definition of prefixes of bits in systat(1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:35:46 -0000 Hello all, I found a wrong definition of prefixes of bits in systat(1) in HEAD. Because Yar Tikhiy has recently commited some changes of this util I wrote him a private email about my find. But for some completely unintelligible for me reason he is not agreeing that the current definitions of prefixes of bits in the systat(1) are wrong. However he suggested to discuss it on the mailing list. I've opened a bin/106116 PR with the patch and wrote there most of my arguments to Yar. What do you all think about that? Thanks