Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 28 May 2006 22:52:56 +0545
From:      Samit Jana <janasamit@wlink.com.np>
To:        Emre Bastuz <info@emre.de>
Cc:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PPPOE over VLan Interfaces
Message-ID:  <200605282252.57112.janasamit@wlink.com.np>
In-Reply-To: <1148804663.44795e3714acc@netmail1.netcologne.de>
References:  <200605272037.34036.janasamit@wlink.com.np> <1148804663.44795e3714acc@netmail1.netcologne.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi EB,=20

Thanks for your input .Basically the scenario and setup resembles, the only=
=20
diff is I am trying to deploy it on Metro ethernet kind of topology which=20
spans to multiple switches cascaded/trunked via optical fibre.=20
The only thing that worries me is No. of simultaneous connection :(  but no=
w=20
pretty much confident though :)

=2D-=20
samit

On Sunday 28 May 2006 14:09, Emre Bastuz wrote:
> Hello Samit,
>
> Zitat von Samit Jana <janasamit@wlink.com.np>:
> > Now before I put the boxes on Production to serve over 400 simultaneous
> > connections  and over 40 VLAN interfaces, I would like to hear some
> > comments If anybody running similar kind of setup? and is  there any
> > performance issues known so far?
>
> I am using a similar setup for parallel testing of ADSL modems:
> -> FreeBSD 4.X box with a PCI quad-interface
> -> two ethernet interfaces connected as trunks to a 48 port switch
> -> one port used for "regular" connectivity and administration
> -> every port except the trunk and admin ports configured in different
> vlans -> every VLAN with it=B4s own PPPOE connection
> -> every PPPOE login script with it=B4s own static hostroute to a particu=
lar
> IP address on a download server, uniquely set up for this PPPOE connection
> (hostroutes required to force traffic through every PPPOE connection) ->
> MRTG for monitoring the throughput on each interface in the switch
>
> Works great for 2 years now.
>
> The only thing I=B4d monitor is the throughput on the trunks. Apart from =
that
> the configuration should scale reasonably well.
>
> I=B4m not quite sure if this was what you wanted to know but hey: you ask=
ed
> for VLAN and PPPOE ;-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Emre
>
> --
> http://www.emre.de                        UIN: 561260
> PGP Key ID: 0xAFAC77FD
>
> I don't see why some people even HAVE cars. -- Calvin




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605282252.57112.janasamit>