From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Nov 30 10:26:42 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id KAA08535 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 10:26:42 -0800 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA08530 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 10:26:40 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA04877; Thu, 30 Nov 1995 10:20:10 -0800 To: "Eric L. Hernes" cc: Robert Withrow , hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Wanted: Examples of ``good practice'' device drivers. In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Nov 1995 10:22:00 CST." <199511301622.KAA01227@jake.lodgenet.com> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 1995 10:20:10 -0800 Message-ID: <4875.817755610@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > As it sits now it is applicable to 2.0 2.0.5 and 2.1, but is > about to become dated w.r.t -current ;( I wouldn't sweat that.. We should only really have a mandate to document the current *released* version, not something we're probably not going to unveil until next summer. Jordan