Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:57:01 +0300 From: "John Smith" <almarrie@gmail.com> To: "Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jeff Mohler <speedtoys.racing@gmail.com> Subject: Re: v6 speed compared to previous versions Message-ID: <499c70c0611132357t22881917l6537689b55865a4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20061114072536.GA62039@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <4558C9E4.6050008@ccstores.com> <20061113212557.GB53818@xor.obsecurity.org> <a969fbd10611131351o3e47869p3b9abc9f586475c3@mail.gmail.com> <20061113215514.GA54739@xor.obsecurity.org> <499c70c0611132227l150c105bmca466de628e6fa92@mail.gmail.com> <20061114072536.GA62039@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/14/06, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > > When was this corrected? Is 6.2 going to be faster than 6.1? > > As I said earlier, some of the most important changes that went into > 6.0 were fixing performance problems in 5.x. Since then it's been a > process of polishing and improving, instead of architectural changes. > So 6.2 is expected to be "better" than 6.1 but probably not measurably > faster for general workloads. > > > Did the guys port the libthr changes into 6.2 or not? > > Dunno what you mean here. > > Kris I mean the libthr threading library, MySQL works better with it in 6.1 so I hope the last changes done by David Xu is ported to 6.2 Thank you, -J
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?499c70c0611132357t22881917l6537689b55865a4>