Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 19:14:54 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com> To: chuckr@glue.umd.edu (Chuck Robey) Cc: davem+@andrew.cmu.edu, freebsd-questions@freefall.freebsd.org, questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ethernet packet sniffer. Message-ID: <199601190314.TAA05783@ref.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960118214019.9200A-100000@cappuccino.eng.umd.edu> from "Chuck Robey" at Jan 18, 96 09:44:04 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > No, it only would reveal physical connections, Mike Smith was right > about what he said, there isn't any way to detect a receiver. This would > only detect extra cable taps that a network administrator didn't know > about. And it wouldn't reveal what those taps were doing, either, just > that they existed. They wouldn't reveal a nonintrusive high impedance tap.. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199601190314.TAA05783>