From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul  6 12:42:49 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE4016A41C
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Jul 2005 12:42:49 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from robbak@gmail.com)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBB843D46
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  6 Jul 2005 12:42:48 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from robbak@gmail.com)
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so1115130wra
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 06 Jul 2005 05:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=id4DgWPRR7JJLEUJc1gik720QakT7cT+cBs3JJVjtNLxDRY4yfLa7eM5CdT+DGs9n8LWxFPZNzDGm0NYV/scfxEIamfGQM46OTIn0keVz8YwTfWxORhkRoHkWrXqH+pm/CQMVfGGuIDS3+XuPjiuhCgeUtGgAM/RTtuVC0l1wio=
Received: by 10.54.3.30 with SMTP id 30mr383232wrc;
	Wed, 06 Jul 2005 05:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.128.6 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jul 2005 05:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d449958050706054235ddd81a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 22:42:48 +1000
From: Robert Backhaus <robbak@gmail.com>
To: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>
In-Reply-To: <20050706122110.GC39292@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20041102222000.GA65845@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20050706073205.GA942@galgenberg.net>
	<20050706085737.GT73907@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
	<200507061116.17267.thierry@herbelot.com>
	<d44995805070604116064805@mail.gmail.com>
	<20050706122110.GC39292@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, thierry@herbelot.com
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Ports are not ready for CFLAGS=-O2 in 6.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Robert Backhaus <robbak@gmail.com>
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 12:42:49 -0000

On 7/6/05, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>=20
> > Of course, the _correct_ way to fix this is for the ports that are now
> > broken by -O2 to be fixed by forcing -O in their makefiles, which
> > really should have been done from the beginning.
>=20
> I agree that the correct way to fix ports broken with -O2 is to force
> -O in their makefiles, but this does not say that having something
> like PORTS_CFLAGS would be a bad idea, does it ?
>=20
> Regards,
> --
> Jeremie Le Hen

No, not at all: A useful extra feature for those who, for instance,
wish to use increased -O levels for ports.