From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jul 29 09:23:26 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA08257
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 29 Jul 1996 09:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA08250
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jul 1996 09:23:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id JAA12583; Mon, 29 Jul 1996 09:22:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shrimp.whistle.com(207.76.205.74) by whistle.com via smap (V1.3)
	id sma012581; Mon Jul 29 09:22:17 1996
Received: (from julian@localhost) by shrimp.whistle.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id JAA15299; Mon, 29 Jul 1996 09:22:16 -0700
From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
Message-Id: <199607291622.JAA15299@shrimp.whistle.com>
Subject: Re: IPX (NS) stuff
To: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis)
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 09:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199607291428.KAA02782@etinc.com> from "Dennis" at Jul 29, 96 10:28:22 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 It wouldn't surprise me.. ipx was put in in a rush

> 
> 
> Tcpdump seems to decode ipx packets, but you cant do a
> 
> tcpdump -i ed1
> 
> if there is is only an xns address associated with ed1, and you can't do
> 
> tcpdump -proto ipx
> 
> is this correct?
> 
> Dennis
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Emerging Technologies, Inc.      http://www.etinc.com
> 
> Synchronous Communications Cards and Routers For
> Discriminating Tastes. 56k to T1 and beyond. Frame
> Relay, PPP, HDLC, and X.25 for BSD/OS, FreeBSD 
> and LINUX
> 
>