From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 23 13:10:10 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C3916A4CE
	for <freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 23 May 2004 13:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F9143D1F
	for <freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 23 May 2004 13:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i4NK9b8Q002486;
	Sun, 23 May 2004 16:09:37 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 16:09:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com
To: JG <amd64list@jpgsworld.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20040523100537.014613a8@mail.ojoink.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10405231604190.711-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why is MySQL nearly twice as fast on Linux? 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 20:10:10 -0000

On Sun, 23 May 2004, JG wrote:
> >
> >None consolidated in the same post with the same versions
> >of FreeBSD and mysql.  Like I said before, there are a ton
> >of posts on amd64@ and some here on threads@.  It would
> >help much if you were to summarize them on a web page so
> >that all of us don't have to go searching through all
> >the archives trying to do it ourselves.
> 
> Good idea, I'll do that now.
> 
> >  The default configuration with
> >libpthread vs FreeBSD-linuxthreads seems to be similar.
> 
> I would disagree from what I've seen so far. Nothing came
> close to the remote tests using Linuxthreads.

But I don't see how using network connections vs
domain socket (is that what local uses?) affects
a threading library.  And if you compare FreeBSD
linuxthreads to native linuxthreads, it still
isn't close which still shows to me that it is
the kernel.

-- 
Dan Eischen