From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 26 00:22:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A202106564A; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:22:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051E58FC19; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:22:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (unknown [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4599D206A8; Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:22:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E067BED.9010101@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 02:23:09 +0200 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Philip M. Gollucci" References: <4E066D7A.50603@FreeBSD.org> <4E067499.6080004@p6m7g8.com> <4E0677F6.5080004@FreeBSD.org> <4E067929.7060209@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <4E067929.7060209@p6m7g8.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ohauer@FreeBSD.org, "Philip M. Gollucci" , apache@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [patch] to notify users about the deprecation of apache13/20 without touching any port X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ohauer@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 00:22:59 -0000 On 2011-06-26 02:11, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> Do you want to swap the apache version with the next FreeBSD release >> or before? > Before 9.0/8.next > >> Idea behind the patch is to note users and porters. >> We can test building but not for functionality for every port. > Yep, but they expressed wanting to switch the default before marking 13 > deprecated en mass before. OK, will wait for the results of my local-expr run, but I don't expect bigger issues. -- olli