From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Sat May 21 02:29:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4DEB43B20 for ; Sat, 21 May 2016 02:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6881981 for ; Sat, 21 May 2016 02:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 66246B43B1F; Sat, 21 May 2016 02:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D3AB43B1E for ; Sat, 21 May 2016 02:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Received: from pmta2.delivery6.ore.mailhop.org (pmta2.delivery6.ore.mailhop.org [54.200.129.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FB95197F for ; Sat, 21 May 2016 02:29:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) X-MHO-User: ef50173d-1efb-11e6-a09e-4d61a6885157 X-Report-Abuse-To: https://support.duocircle.com/support/solutions/articles/5000540958-duocircle-standard-smtp-abuse-information X-Originating-IP: 73.34.117.227 X-Mail-Handler: DuoCircle Outbound SMTP Received: from ilsoft.org (unknown [73.34.117.227]) by outbound2.ore.mailhop.org (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 21 May 2016 02:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rev (rev [172.22.42.240]) by ilsoft.org (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u4L2TaYO059460; Fri, 20 May 2016 20:29:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <1463797776.1180.357.camel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Build -j target tags and command output From: Ian Lepore To: "Simon J. Gerraty" , Bryan Drewery Cc: arch@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 20:29:36 -0600 In-Reply-To: <77472.1456528808@kaos.jnpr.net> References: <56D0CD68.606@FreeBSD.org> <77472.1456528808@kaos.jnpr.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 02:29:45 -0000 On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 15:20 -0800, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > Bryan Drewery wrote: > > I'm looking for opinions on whether we should keep or remove the -- > > Keep. > > Without them it is virtually impossible to identify which job > produced > certain output. > > Even with them, the log from a parallel hirerarchical build can get > confusing - especially when multiple makes are writing at the same > time. > But you are still better off with some clues. > > > Removing them would yield potentially hard-to-debug failures since > > the > > Yes, pls don't do that. > > > failed command could be anywhere. At least the 'make stopped' > > error > > that follows would print the directory. There is an interesting > > feature > > Yes, but generally the exciting stuff that caused the stoppage is > earlier in the log. > The --- lines allow use of scripts to demux the output. > Are any such scripts available? -- Ian (catching up on really old mail)