From owner-freebsd-current Fri Mar 8 11:33:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from web21106.mail.yahoo.com (web21106.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.227.108]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 201BA37B417 for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:33:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20020308193327.15974.qmail@web21106.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [62.254.0.4] by web21106.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 08 Mar 2002 11:33:27 PST Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:33:27 -0800 (PST) From: Hiten Pandya Reply-To: hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Preparing innocent users for -current To: Doug Barton , Murray Stokely , bmah@FreeBSD.org Cc: current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20020308110442.G32653-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Shouldn't this be CC'ed to -doc as well? Maybe someone will write an article on a little release note kinda thing for this issue. Just an opinion from a -current user. :) -- Hiten --- Doug Barton wrote: > On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Murray Stokely wrote: > > > As discussed at BSDCon, the release engineers are committed to > > releasing a relatively stable snapshot of FreeBSD -CURRENT on or > > around April 1, 2002. > > As much as I still think this is really bad timing for all the > reasons I expressed at the summit, if we're going to do this one of the > things we must absolutely do is create the list of "Things in -current > that will bite unsuspecting RELENG_4 users in the ass," and their > solutions, if any. Off the top of my head: > > 1. phk malloc debugging flags enabled by default. Solutions include > recompiling apps, and toggling things off in /etc/malloc.conf. > > 2. pam modules break backwards compatibility with pam apps compiled on > RELENG_4. The only solution I've been offered is to recompile things (or, > my preferred solution, don't use pam). > > 3. xconsole causes periodic panics. The problem (according to BDE) is "a > well-know bug in printf(9)," caused by "The TIOCCONS ioctl ... panics when > printf() is called while sched_lock is held." I reported this bug in > October 2001, if anyone wants to look through the archives. > > > Related to 2. above, since the port of XFree86-4 is still at > 4.1.0, I went to the xfree86.org web page and installed their packaged > version of 4.2.0. Because of the pam breakage, xdm from that package > doesn't work. Therefore, it would be nice to have the port upgraded so > that the only solution available to users would actually be available. > > Other than that, -current works pretty well for me. I use it daily > on my workstation at home, and have for years. My strategy is to keep good > backups, especially of a known-safe kernel. I used to compile -current > every few days, and I'd usually install it too. I stopped doing that after > the smpng work started, but I still try to update at least once a month. > The periods of instability are a price I'm willing to pay for a better > system down the road, even if it's frustrating sometimes. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email! http://mail.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message