Date: Wed, 08 Nov 1995 16:20:55 -0800 From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: hsu@cs.hut.fi, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port of strace? Message-ID: <199511090020.QAA10452@precipice.shockwave.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 08 Nov 1995 16:00:52 PST." <199511090000.QAA00284@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Subject: Re: port of strace? * Sounds like there is a value add for such a port. I don't think we'd * reject it should it be submitted. Umm, let me just point out that we've never "reject"ed a port because it's "value" is not enough. There has been a certain member (Paul, that's you :) who complains from time to time that a port is not worthy (in much less decent language), but that has never been the attitude of the whole ports team or the portsmaster (that's me). Now you're misquoting me. I never said the port was a <censored>. I said that the program itself was a <censored> <censored> <censored>. :-) I actually do think there are valid reasons for rejecting a port or a program, even if we disagree on identd as a specific example.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511090020.QAA10452>