From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 30 17:14:32 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A1C1065670
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:14:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org)
Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933758FC1C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:14:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NQ26j-00071j-NV
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:13:13 +0100
Received: from pool-70-21-17-159.res.east.verizon.net ([70.21.17.159])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:13:13 +0100
Received: from nightrecon by pool-70-21-17-159.res.east.verizon.net with local
	(Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 18:13:13 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
From: Michael Powell <nightrecon@hotmail.com>
Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:11:15 -0500
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <hhg1le$c65$2@ger.gmane.org>
References: <4B3B7BC4.8080807@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk>
	<hhg1a6$c65$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-70-21-17-159.res.east.verizon.net
User-Agent: KNode/4.3.4
Sender: news <news@ger.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: geometry does not match label
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:14:33 -0000

Michael Powell wrote:

[snip]
> 
> You should know that the ad0/ad1 will result in a fairly drastic
> performance hit. This is a master/slave arrangement on the same channel.
> You really really should get another cable and do the ad0/ad2 arrangement.
> 

And, of course, as soon as I hit the "Send" button it occurred to me this 
really only applies to a PATA drive set and is meaningless if both drives 
are SATA. Disregard if using SATA!  :-)

-Mike