From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 11 08:47:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589FA106566C for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nino80@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f223.google.com (mail-fx0-f223.google.com [209.85.220.223]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5A68FC19 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm23 with SMTP id 23so8021550fxm.3 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:47:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=2ewmpRQBouqaUN/EsNq1u5byXKspG5SWAZVeBxAAKyo=; b=veinvRrJDRhIeAN4+mZw471Spzy3K0pZtzhp5EUxnITNR0uQW2Fn8aSoabPJYpVjS+ NFsN2Bpm/W3YwLBfFn5Bl6tNqcsOn/WQ3ahtJZPLm04UcoM85XV12dZa5bBaxNpvIPDx 7sCFJ6sCS6dSSJA7EJLiUq2IjCC2gKVZ7+oO0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=AVhzRFN8u5v0KWZ8MsLn2ousxJ6/SYBGBromNyDGX37jisHF2BYpAlK5Jjk/wRpE5z Q/6EyRC3dYGosFJmmVDZlpVe/+dSGHc7/Gfx0TZW3owuYtQsgo8E3B4tZz8/qcgfF5Ft gYeFyiEjuVXLNqpNEqE59HzqEcbXHKp6pXmJ0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.102.169.26 with SMTP id r26mr608269mue.27.1268297250711; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:47:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B9828B2.2010903@elischer.org> References: <92bcbda51003100912k25facb5cxc9047105c91a4022@mail.gmail.com> <4B97E412.1050506@elischer.org> <4B981FE5.5090905@smartt.com> <4B9828B2.2010903@elischer.org> From: n j Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:47:10 +0100 Message-ID: <92bcbda51003110047s717bed1bq8bb3eb787eab47f7@mail.gmail.com> To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: IPFIREWALL_FORWARD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:47:32 -0000 > A loadable module requires a coherent piece of code to implement the > functionality, that can be put into the module. This option > scatters tiny snippets of code throughout the exisitng > TCP/UDP/IP/ipfw code. Is that just a matter of current implementation or is that 'scatter' necessary for forward functionality? -- Nino