Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:20:44 +0100
From:      Josef El-Rayes <josef@daemon.li>
To:        Michael Ranner <mranner@inode.at>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Status reports - why not regularly?
Message-ID:  <20040113202044.GA419@jenny.daemon.li>
In-Reply-To: <200401132110.46091.mranner@inode.at>
References:  <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net> <200401132038.01349.mranner@inode.at> <20040113195106.GA321@jenny.daemon.li> <200401132110.46091.mranner@inode.at>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Michael Ranner <mranner@inode.at> wrote:
> Nobody can outsource a project which does not already exist. First
> we need some people willing to have time beside their real life and
> real work to do some research on commits and discussions, requests
> status from developers and summarize all this information together.

ok seems like i missed that the discussion is heading in a new direction,
i thought it is still about the classic status report we used to have.

so you can savely ignore my last messages :)

sorry, josef

--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD)

iQEVAwUBQARTHFnFItmnnbU8AQJXawf/d8UT66loQpdmPRAUx6F0jSY/nabjpXl6
jwBKGWLerLv+qU6PVLGTuBdhU6Q4qqtL/783RHr/PLdwKj6h0NHybm2Ohl8gfIr4
v84LhpFcgy53Pj3mq1QZd9UiiglSV66leywsTzsbdQJzvYnwDchqSAPmg+/Abgk7
NY9VL0qKfsUDew7DIMKqI9xTGSVeDMxf5CHa1KSaU7Nqy07IhLB8JeNgbr74E8K5
YQMfCM7rihUThTW4cMJ452KVOoXo6wHJuVPeBu2McFtU40Z2fS0bKGAcOQbmUS+E
z/pTBi/4p3QknrtXTVFLtzli2yvfJrBF4otATFXb3VAabWyjiRSFiA==
=kBhY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040113202044.GA419>