From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Apr 29 23: 4:37 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C3337B422 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 23:04:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net) Received: from dwcjr (DWCJR.inethouston.net [216.118.21.147]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1DC10F40F; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 01:04:42 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <00bc01c0d13b$72b34200$931576d8@inethouston.net> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Juha Saarinen" Cc: References: Subject: Re: tail Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 01:04:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm sure my mail filters can handle it, but this has been the typical practice for most programs. vi cat and a few others, ee will actually give an error, but its one of the few. You'd have to speak to some of the developers as to why it does this. > Well, most people don't, do they? You go tail /var/log/htpd > and your fat fingers hit enter instead "accesslog". If there was a point to > that behaviour, I wouldn't argue about it, but since there doesn't seem to > be any, I might just flame away for a little longer. ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message