From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Aug 20 22:10:19 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C7216A4FB
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:10:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org)
Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.158])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C21043D7F
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:10:06 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org)
Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 241B65C34; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:14:55 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:14:55 -0400
From: Wesley Shields <wxs@atarininja.org>
To: "Pascal G. Hofstee" <caelian@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20060820221455.GA12875@atarininja.org>
References: <4ac1e6310608190708k548a0a8ewf750669c9a98bc1b@mail.gmail.com>
	<20060820211351.GA12681@atarininja.org>
	<1156110455.1161.1.camel@chekov>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1156110455.1161.1.camel@chekov>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14
Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: lang/mono
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:10:19 -0000

On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 11:47:34PM +0200, Pascal G. Hofstee wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 17:13 -0400, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > It's broken on -CURRENT for amd64 and has been for a while.  This has
> > been brought up on the BSD# mailing list recently and, according to
> > people on that list, appears to be broken due to jemalloc.
> 
> Which btw, in no way implies that jemalloc is "wrong" here .. but more
> that mono's internals make false assumptions with regard to the size of
> pointers on amd64.

Correct.  I was just pointing out (in a very rough sense) of the
timeframe of when it stopped working on AMD64.  Looking back I can see
how I should have worded that better.  :)

-- WXS